2020-09-01 09:46:29, , The Brand Protection Blog
Content Categorization
/Law & Government/Legal/Bankruptcy
Word Count:
513
Words/Sentence:
29
Reading Time:
5.13 min
Reading Quality:
Advanced
Readability:
16th or higher
Therefore, it is preferable to address the insolvency risks when the initial license agreement is negotiated.
In view of the potential impact of German insolvency law, the parties of non-exclusive license agreements are encouraged to review the terms of their licenses.
Particularly in the unprecedented, uncertain times of the COVID-19 pandemic, it would be advisable to explore what can be done to mitigate any potential insolvency risks, even if imminent issues may not yet be apparent.
Where a party to an IP license becomes insolvent and regular insolvency proceedings are commenced, an insolvency administrator will take over the management of the business.
German insolvency law confers on the administrator (or the self-administrating debtor) a choice as to whether to affirm or terminate a non-exclusive license agreement.
License agreements generally include continuing and recurring obligations for each party, most notably, ongoing license payments and the continued grant of the right to use the respective IP rights.
There are legal means which may help to reduce risks associated with an insolvency of a party to the license agreement; however, it is important that the parties take such measures before the threat of insolvency arises.
Link to full article: https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en-de/knowledge/publications/88a29bb1/covid-19-major-risk-flowing-from-nonexclusive-patent-licenses-under-german-insolvency-law
Keywords
Interested in Learning More?
Article Analysis is at the foundation of powerful media monitoring and insights. Learn what you can build with powerful curated search engines, real-time listening and trend analysis on the topics, markets and companies critical to your organization.