Carbon Footprint F1

Subscribe to our Climate Insights Newsletter!

* indicates required

Learn More about our ESG AI Initiatives!

Contact Us

When it comes to comparing the carbon footprints of various sports, it’s not always an apples-to-apples comparison. For instance, the carbon footprint of 23 Formula 1 (F1) races versus larger quantities of other sports games like the NFL, NCAA D1 football, and MLB might be misleading or inaccurate. The carbon footprint of car races, inclusive of practice sessions, sprint races, qualifying sessions, and other elements, may be larger than initially estimated when juxtaposed with other sports.

One of the biggest challenges in making these assessments is the limited availability of data. This can hinder the accurate measurement of the per spectator carbon footprint of various sporting events. For example, the data referenced in certain comparisons does not provide information about other sports. This weakens the argument regarding the comparative carbon footprints of F1 races.

Another aspect that must be considered is the travel habits of fans. F1 fans often travel longer distances to attend races, potentially contributing to a larger carbon footprint. This is unlike local sports games where the majority of spectators are from the surrounding area and travel shorter distances to attend.

Despite these challenges, efforts are being made within the F1 industry to reduce its carbon footprint. Pirelli, the exclusive tire supplier for F1, is enhancing its tire recycling initiatives and plans to reduce the number of tires used on a race weekend. This initiative is part of a broader movement within the sport to address its environmental impact.

Mario Isola, Pirelli’s racing director, has reassured fans that these sustainability changes will not negatively impact the racing quality. He explained that Pirelli has already reduced the number of tires used by teams from 13 sets per car down to 11. This has led to significant savings over a race season and is an excellent example of how the sport can maintain its excitement and competitive edge while also being mindful of its impact on the environment.

In conclusion, while the comparison of carbon footprints between F1 and other sports may be complex and at times misleading, it is clear that steps are being taken to address this issue within the racing industry. As more data becomes available, and as sustainability initiatives like Pirelli’s continue to evolve, it will become increasingly possible to make more accurate and meaningful comparisons.